<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Coffee Cup Half Moons &#187; Intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com/blog/category/intelligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com</link>
	<description>The philosophical musings of a human specimen.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>And then onto the field of robotics &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com/blog/2010/06/17/and-then-onto-the-field-of-robotics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com/blog/2010/06/17/and-then-onto-the-field-of-robotics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watson the talking computer built by IBM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com/?p=1030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It just occurred to me that other than astrophysics and/or particle physics (which really just interest me more than fit me), the most logical field to get into is robotics.  The New York times published an article today about Watson, a supercomputer built by IBM that can converse with you.  I got to thinking about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just occurred to me that other than astrophysics and/or particle physics (which really just interest me more than fit me), the most logical field to get into is robotics.  The New York times <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5565462/the-magic-of-watson-ibms-question+answering-supercomputer" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/gizmodo.com/5565462/the-magic-of-watson-ibms-question+answering-supercomputer?referer=');">published an article today about Watson</a>, a supercomputer built by IBM that can converse with you.  I got to thinking about it, after reading the article, and it seems to me we are looking at robotics the wrong way.</p>
<p>We constantly refer to &#8220;complex human language,&#8221; but realistically, it is rather simple, it&#8217;s just had millions of years of evolution to refine and set up natural exception handling.  All we do mentally is perceive, compare, catalog, and reconstitute &#8212; all things we can easily make a computer do.  What&#8217;s hard coded in us, however, is our need to survive and our drive to properly mimic (beginning with the actions and language of our parents).  I believe very strongly that all of this can be programmed into a very simple &#8220;blank-slate&#8221; machine with &#8220;senses,&#8221; a movable &#8220;body,&#8221; and a need to understand will nearly immediately become a human-sparked variation of the natural phenomenon we know as biological life.</p>
<p>And so, since robotics really seems to blend my interests of mathematics, computers, and languages (and even the physics of electricity), it&#8217;s a natural field for me to embrace.  Perhaps one day when my bloggy pontifications make me rich.</p>
<p>Feel free to chuckle.  <img src='http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Also check out:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com/blog/2010/06/17/just-a-thought-on-thoughts-this-that-or-the-other/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Just a thought on thoughts &#8230; this that or the other</a></li><li><a href="http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com/blog/2009/02/06/more-on-the-concept-of-free-will/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">More on the concept of free will</a></li><li><a href="http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com/blog/2009/02/11/an-overabundance-of-souls/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">An overabundance of souls &#8230;</a></li><li><a href="http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com/blog/2009/11/12/dream-me-as-john-crichton/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Dream: Me as John Crichton in a Firefly to Farscape &#8230; mashup?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com/blog/2009/11/11/to-be-who-you-are-you-must-first-be-someone-else/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">To be who you are, you must first be someone else</a></li><li>Powered by <a href="http://ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/contextual-related-posts/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/contextual-related-posts/?referer=');">Contextual Related Posts</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coffeecuphalfmoons.com/blog/2010/06/17/and-then-onto-the-field-of-robotics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

