Dream: Me as John Crichton in a Firefly to Farscape … mashup?

“There are those of us who persistently, stubbornly continue to peer out beyond the boundaries of this existence.  Not because we were born with a superior vantage point, but because we were born with the uncontrollable urge to sidle up to the wall, leap to where our hands barely grip the top, poke our nose over and revel in what we can perceive far beyond.  Nonetheless, this wall holding us in and, in this instance, allowing us to see is itself billions of times more complex than any tiny fraction of what else we will ever understand in our lifetime.”

This quote defines my struggle between the urge to boil down philosophy of existence, and discover the infinite truths that nature already possesses, and it came to me immediately after the following dream in which part of my psyche revealed itself to me in the character of John Crichton.  (The setting of this dream was a morph from Firefly to Farscape).

***********************************************************************

There were three of us — closely examining our hangar, garage — a large metal building that, although I did not recognize it, was familiar to me as our base.  The large door, although I now seem to think it may have been multiple doors, was open, and while two of us circled the perimeter of the building, Shepherd Book was examining tiny fragments of evidence near the roof line.  When I noticed what he was doing, I, too, took a closer look, as I could see there was something there causing him to pontificate.

I am not sure how we were examining these things, as the top of this building was at least fifteen or twenty feet high.  Again, it was a large metal structure that more resembled a garage than a base.  Regardless, what I saw upon closer examination were tiny “scratches” in the metal where something high-velocity had glanced off, causing the rusty surface of the old building to peel up, revealing the shiny metal underneath.

I looked more — on the inside of the building.  At this point, I became conscious of the fact that someone of our crew was missing, and we believed her to be stolen.  Although it was never really clear who it was, I had and still, while writing this, have the impression that it was Kaylee.

We examined closer, following the tiny trail of evidence inside the building, following the ceiling as we went toward a hanging apparatus that I’m pretty sure was the garage door opener.  Simple, but the sci-fi ambiance of this place failed to give me any reason to think that it was an object out of place or time.  Something opened the door, why not a motorized contraption that mounts to the ceiling?

Then suddenly, I noticed a slightly different “peeling of metal.”  This one was about the same size, but it was shinier, more rounded, and it became immediately clear to me that there was something embedded there — right in the motor of the door opener.  I could not tell right away what it was, but it appeared to be a round disc — actually, two round discs that were maybe pressed together — the top one smaller than the bottom.

I looked around more, and suddenly I knew exactly what these objects were.  I saw one embedded flat-ways in the ceiling, and the unmistakable lightly engraved writing of a Sony CR2032 battery came into focus.

Whatever ship had taken our crew member had been firing out Sony CR2032 batteries when it took off.  The strange thing is, of course, that the batteries themselves were incidental.  Nothing about them struck me as out of place.  Rather, this was simple, clear evidence to me that it was humans — people of my own kind and of my own time — that were the culprit.

Also, at this time, I realized that Shepherd Book had morphed into D’Argo, and I was now aware that I was, indeed, John Crichton.  I’m not entirely sure that I hadn’t been the whole time, although I knew very distinctly that I was in the future.  Not just a century or two in the future, but long enough in the future that the human race could have actually evolved into the alien forms surrounding me.  Millions of years in the future!  (Contrary to the proposed timelines of either Firefly OR Farscape.)

As I held one of the batteries in my hand, D’Argo asked me what it was, and I explained that it was a power source from my time.

Someone else contributed: “Something used before the discovery of infinite power.”

I nodded, and continued the explanation, but not before interjecting with the trait that very much makes me me: “Well, almost infinite power.”  A tongue-in-cheek clarification that, for some reason, as usual, I felt compelled to express.  (Clearly this John Crichton had many attributes from Jeremy Tharp.)  Anyway, the obvious flaw in “infinite power” (in terms of electrical power) is that existence of such a thing would surely lead to the instant collapse of the universe.

(In regards to the instant collapse of the universe, I am not trying to argue a point here — regardless of whether such a postulation is true logically, it was completely true in this dream, so it’s best to read it that way.)

I showed the others my watch as a demonstration of the type of device such a little module might power.  My watch had not been working for a very long time, but I explained that I recently began wearing it, even though it was not even working then, because I liked the watch.  (The watch in this dream was a direct allusion to one I wore during my freshman year of college.  Although it did not look exactly the same, it was probably the watch I would have to find today — as in 12 years later, 2009 — to make me want to wear it as I did in 1997.)

Everyone kind of shrugged off the watch thing as yet another of my human, illogical idiosyncrasies, but they got the general point (Very Crichton-esque), and I then began musing and digesting all of this aloud.  After all, the character in my dream was well settled in this place, but the perspective of me — the one hosting this dream — was still blending with the personality of this John Crichton.

“Millions of years!” I shouted.  Holding one of the batteries pried from the wall, I emphatically reiterated “You’re millions of years in my future, and yet it was someone of my own time — my own race — that did this.”  There was a very distinct aroma of “Eureka!” (Not the show, just the sense of clarification) here, but, alas, this discovery was, ultimately, not the culmination of this dream.

All of us were gathered there now, most sitting on a sofa as if this were the lounge in a local fire station.  I, Aeryn Suhn, and D’Argo (and possibly someone else) were still standing.

I perceived a subtle hint of apathy from the crew, and now I realized that, for some reason, that they did not want to leave this place.  Not only did they not want to find our lost companion, but they did not care to continue their personal explorations of the stars, and, to me, this was a travesty.

“I want to see it all!” I screeched so emphatically that every blood vessel in my body must have been visible through my skin.  “Every square inch of it, and I cannot stop until I do!”  By this point, even my own mind had wandered away from the lost member of our crew, and it would never return there.

“I don’t know why, but I do,” I emphasized, disheartened by the looming logic that always begets me when examining infinity: I will die, humans will die, and none of this exotic exploration of the unknown bears any ultimate meaning to anyone but those who will, eventually, cease to exist.

“I do, I do, and there is no other way.”  Perplexed by my own intricacies, I was so overwhelmed with passion that I began to cry, and I fell to my knees before the table (think “coffee table”) that sat in front of the couch.  I sat back on my heels, then crossed my arms on the table as I fell forward and lay my head upon them.  I noticed that this was not actually a coffee table, but an old record player we had in the house throughout my childhood (my real childhood, not John Crichton’s), and, before my head reached its resting place on my arms, I brushed a bit of dust away from the knobs.

Aeryn, quite overwhelmed by my empassioned tirade, found herself crying as well, and she knelt down on the other side of the table, her head atop mine, and somehow consoled me with her own tearful expression.

***********************************************************************

And then I woke up.

To be who you are, you must first be someone else

I felt the urge to examine the following quote from John Stuart Mill and attempt to rationalize the gist of the concept.

War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.

There is a very simple point here:  War is terrible, but refuting war on principle, even when doing so jeopardizes one’s personal freedoms, is far more terrible.

It is very easy to agree with this, because a general philosophy should be that no truth is so absolute that it can contradict another absolute truth.

Now, to examine, I will state that there is a very distinct law in my own personal philosophy: Any state of being is a prison.  Poetically justified: Anything you are is the consummate shadow of everything else that you are not.

In other words, everyone inhabits some sort of prison.  Some have just hung curtains and plants and are happy there, while others are more content fighting to find a better prison.

Thus, the inherent contradiction in this quote becomes evident.  For the idea to hold true, if you want to be anti-war, you must first succumb to a presumed logical inevitability (extraneous to your belief) that you must accept war as a viable method of protecting your belief.

In other words, you are free to be anti war, but to keep it that way, you must think like everyone else and fight a war on your own behalf.  To be who you are, you must first be someone else.

At best this is a conundrum, and by no means is this a logical disproof of war.  It is a simple demonstration that the path laid out by many as a journey to purity will inevitably require a very direct sacrifice of purity to conquer.

There are many branches to this concept, and I have personally examined a large portion of them in depth, but this general idea is a good entry to the philosophy of “breaking one’s chains.”

Twitter weekly updates by crimulus for 2009-09-27

  • “Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” -George Carlin #
  • RT @politico Obama shoul
    d carry, not be, the story http://bit.ly/3nD0dm #
  • RT @factlets York U scientists envision an inflatable kevlar space elevator extending to a height of 25km. http://tw2t.com/mm COOOOOOOOOOL!! #
  • RT @wceberly 28 yrs today, Sept 25, 1981, Sandra Day O´Conn
    or becomes first female U.S. Supreme Court justice in history http://bit.ly/#
  • Understand your opponent and deconstruct. Anticipate your opponent and defend without exertion. Ignore your opponent, and get thrashed. #
  • @YouQuotedQuotes Generally very good — I retweet at least 10% of them. Love having variable content/inspirations each day …
    Keep it up! in reply to YouQuotedQuotes #
  • I have no fear of losing my good name, because it’s safely locked away. I’m pretty sure no one other than me has ever seen it. #
  • RT @YouQuotedQuotes The reward for conformity is everyone likes you but yourself. ~ Rita Mae Brown #Quotes #
  • A fascinating glimpse into Congressional committee debate: http://abv8.me/1kO (@GSTEPHANOPOULOS, Z. Byron Wolf) #
  • RT @PJA64X The foolish man seeks happiness in the distance; the wise grows it under his feet. — James Oppenheim #
  • Michael Moore may be pretty one sided, but he brings up valid points about the shortcomings of capitalism. http://abv8.me/1kJ #
  • RT @wceberly
    Sept 24, 1789, Judiciary Act of 1789, signed by President George Washington, establishing Supreme Court http://bit.ly/11udhi #
  • Wow … new glasses … no tinting … no scratching … no more looking at the world through a piece of terry cloth! gooooooood #
  • @vanadaar lol I know, but at least he presents it in a much more logical fashion than the typical morons on Fox News. #
  • Again, for the conservative propagandists out there @KarlRove of all people shows how to criticize the president properly http://abv8.me/1kj #
  • RT @TheOnion BREAKING: Democrats Hoping To Take Control Of Congress From Republican Minority In 2010 #p2 #tcot LOL #
  • @silverclassics Hey you should use the smily face flask for the artfire ad — the sinbonnet sue one you can see the unevenness of the fabric #
  • RT @PJA64X The silliest woman can manage a clever man; but it needs a very clever woman to manage a fool. — Rudyard Kipling #
  • @silverclassics — sent you an email to gmail #
  • More conservative commentators should take their cues from and mimick the delivery of George Will. http://abv8.me/1kh #
  • RT @PJA64X No one can make you feel inferior without your consent. — Eleanor Roosevelt #
  • RT @TheOnion [audio] New Heart-Shaped Sniper Scope Makes It Impossible For Marines To Shoot Enemies http://ow.ly/15QuwS #
  • RT @factlets Turophiles love cheese. Cheese mavens in France enjoy more than 400 different varieties with their wine. http://tw2t.com/57E #
  • I just cannot get enough history: http://abv8.me/1jA 3rd battle of Winchester battleground preserved. #
  • RT @wceberly Drunk Boris Yeltsin was found outside White House in underpants trying to hail cab ‘he wanted some pizza’ http://bit.ly/3sukU #
  • A fantastic gift idea: Custom Embroidered Hip Flasks by 28 Sides Designs. http://abv8.me/1jw #
  • #threecondimentsonly tabasco, relish, sour cream #
  • RT @YouQuotedQuotes To have and not give is often worse than to steal. ~ Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach #Quotes #
  • Is it just me, or are the sides of these two’ faces mirroring one anothers’ scrunching? lol http://abv8.me/1ju #
  • RT @wceberly Sept 22, 1862, Abraham Lincoln issues Emancipation Proclamation: recasts Civil War as fight agst slavery http://bit.ly/4gsZm7 #
  • RT @PJA64X Success is a consequence and must not be a goal. — Gustave Flaubert #
  • RT @factlets Scientists are ready to perform the Schrodinger´s Cat experiment on a living organism. http://tw2t.com/Zwq #
  • It’s ok to take your eye off the prize, as long as you still walk away with the winnings. http://abv8.me/1iH #Obama — regain control. #
  • WOOOHOO … #Patriots lose … that is always good in my book, of course #Jets & #Bills won, but I’ll take what I can get. #
  • Oh dont lean on me man, cause you cant afford the ticket Im back from suffragette city #
  • RT @PJA64X Let us not look back in anger or forward in fear, but around in awareness. — James Thurber #
  • RT @factlets appendix evolved 80 million years ago as a repository for good bacteria to repopulate the gut after illness http://tw2t.com/ocS #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter weekly updates by crimulus for 2009-09-20

  • RT @PJA64X If you clean the floor with love, you have done an invisible painting. — Osho #
  • Had a great idea for a website yesterday … then found out it was already done lol http://kompoz.com/ Oh well … maybe I can do it too. #
  • RT @PJA64X If man makes himself a worm he must not complain when he is trodden on. — Immanuel Kant #
  • Had a good time helping dad with FInn’s new bed, good steak & potato dinner + shooting the shit. :-D #
  • It is aggravating–just 9 years ago we had a record surplus, diminishing debt (half what it is now). I suppose bickering will get it back. #
  • US Economy: Velocity Of Money And M1 Multiplier Paint A Mixed Picture http://abv8.me/1g5 A good read for those interested in #economics #
  • I maintain that this the US teeters on the verge of civil war: two sides avoiding change and resolution by simply blaming the other side. #
  • I maintain that this the US teeters on the verge of civil war: two sides avoiding change by blaming the other side. #
  • I find it interesting that right wingers and left wingers both complain about government greed and power hunger … #
  • #fascism is a society of natural selection. The best suited to control get to control — the strongest (best suited) survive. #
  • #federalism certainly sounds nice, but it is, in effect, unity through division. #
  • #anarchy would also be pretty nice, if humans would learn to indulge in personal contentment. #
  • #utopia is making the best of whatever restrictions you inherited at birth. #
  • #libertarianism would be wonderful if there weren’t always someone trying to screw up what you have. #
  • #communism is, by definition, fair, but it does little to promote human curiosity and advancement, as there is no incentive to progress. #
  • #capitalism is supposed to be fair, but it must start as utopia to ensure no one has an exploitable advantage. Fairness must be regulated. #
  • Human biology as the parts of speech: period, colon, semi-colon (post-colorectomy), coma? lol hhmmmm #
  • You can never 100% trust anything you read in the news, and that, obviously, includes Fox News http://abv8.me/1fI #
  • How Much Poop Does America Flush? http://abv8.me/1fH #
  • RT @silverclassics 28 Sides Designs & Crafts on Artfire http://abv8.me/1ft #
  • @silverclassics I saw your update to artfire–very nice. Relates to your campaigns — how to keep info/images synchronized on multiple sites #
  • Too Good to Check? by @factcheckdotorg Unsubstianted, unverified claims make it into presidential speeches too … #
  • RT @YOUQUOTEDQUOTES Happiness is enhanced by others, but does not depend upon others. Unknown #
  • I am deeply enraptured by the rich history of the US, and yet I am awed realizing that it’s dwarfed by that of the rest of the world. #
  • Not that @MMFA is particularly unbiased, but this article brings up a dire point. Stop the hatred, get on with resolution http://abv8.me/1fD #
  • RT @wceberly 233 yrs today, Sept 18 1776, General George Washington reports to Congress on Battle of Harlem Heights, NY http://bit.ly/4cEFZy #
  • As someone who believes in making accusations when the facts are all in, this could be exactly what is needed RE: #ACORN http://abv8.me/1fn #
  • http://abv8.me/1ef WOW 72 years on television … ending. Seems pretty historical in a way. #
  • RT @PJA64X Nick Vujicic: You Can Get Back Up! http://bit.ly/2xqU3F If this video doesn´t inspire you, you are either blind or dead! #
  • “By one count, Bush had 36 czar positions filled by 46 people during his eight years as president.” [Wash. Post, 9/16/09] http://abv8.me/1ee #
  • A likely 47-million-year-old missing evolutionary link (Ida the lemur): http://abv8.me/1ed Aweeessssoooooommmmmeee. #
  • US Constitution S5P2: “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behavior …” #
  • RT @thewordoftheday 17/9 – fulgurant (/ˈfʌlgyərənt/) – adj: flashing like lightning. #
  • “Do not handicap your children by making their lives easy.” -Robert Heinlein #
  • I should correct my last post, we are actually much further down the Rahn curve, but it’s certainly intriguing to examine the concept. #
  • Gov’t spending and its effects on econ. growth: http://abv8.me/1dB Note how US spending teeters consistently at the peak: http://abv8.me/1dC #
  • 1% of Americans are in jail. http://abv8.me/1dA <0.1% of ACORN chapters are under fraud investigation. Is ACORN ahead of the curve? #
  • Despite the slander, a LOT of honest people work at ACORN with good intentions, and this is a demonstration of it. http://abv8.me/1dz #
  • Pretty obvious, but if you want to have an opinion, you need to make sure you understand it. That is true for everyone. #
  • @thecuriousmind you have great posts but just way too many lol … unfollowing for now #
  • Great page for photographers and animal enthusiasts: http://abv8.me/1dc #
  • @foxnews Sorry, but you have as many posts as everyone else I’m following combined … too much clutter, must unfollow. #
  • RT @adamostrow LOL – http://bit.ly/4u4oK (via @jbruin) #
  • This may be the most relevant-to-me scientific discovery of the last 50 years lol http://abv8.me/1d5 AWESOME !!!!!!!!!!! #
  • “You meet your destiny on the road you take to avoid it” – Carl Jung #
  • While I have theorized the racism concept myself, it’s a difficult sell, and it surprised me Carter brought it up. http://abv8.me/1cY #
  • How to mix positive and negative, skepticism and encouragement without beheading the other side. http://abv8.me/1cX #WaPo (Health Care Math) #
  • While the article has right-leaning jabs and some bias, and I historically dislike the author — WOW well said http://abv8.me/1cV #ctwhitman #
  • 2 mil on 9/12? No. Not even close. http://abv8.me/1cT http://abv8.me/1cU However it clearly had an impact on negating public support gains. #
  • Public plan isn’t possible – Bob Franken http://abv8.me/1cS Ouch … scathing commentary, but well reasoned. #
  • What a constructive approach yields in reference to ACORN: http://abv8.me/1cR #
  • Point/counterpoint is not the same as pomp/contortion. If you’re going to argue a point, try to absorb this rather simple philosophy. #
  • @adamostrow Ellipses … should .. be … used … any … time … even … be … tween … the … occasional … sylla … ble. #
  • The 3 i’s of pending civil breakdown: Ignorance, Intolerance, and Inaction. If any one is present, complete failure is nigh. #
  • The disdain growing toward gov’t–a CONSTITUTIONALLY elected gov’t–is a lack of trust in the charter itself. Don’t blame them. Blame you. #
  • http://abv8.me/1cc A fair boiling down of the Health Care conundrum … This is what Congress gets paid to think about, so think think think #
  • Hmm … strangely controversial? A little self centered, but it’s the freakin HOF — it IS all about him. #MJ #Jordan http://abv8.me/1cb #
  • Call Obama’s bluff: http://abv8.me/1c9 The voice of reason takes many forms, and this is certainly exemplary of the best of those forms. #
  • RT @factcheckdotorg Q: Did Obama order creation of a postage stamp to honor a Muslim holiday? A: http://bit.ly/vUaqf #
  • A reasonable excuse to reasonably evaluate your opinions of government: http://abv8.me/1c7 #
  • @vanadaar GRAAHH I hate the pats ….. :( Oh well plenty of season left. in reply to vanadaar #
  • Patrick Swayze was seriously 57 years old?!?! Crazy … still young, but wow I always thought he was closer to me in age. (I’m 30) #
  • Personally, “You lie” is over for me, but this article: http://abv8.me/1aU gives a great summation of tempers in Congress! Notice 1856. #
  • @silverclassics Just think about how great it will be when it is done! #
  • Philosophy in 140 characters or less is a challenge, but an excellent exercise in the art of succinctness. #
  • In the ideal capitalism, everyone works and succeeds equally. In the ideal communism, everyone has what they need. Neither ideal exists. #
  • @JIMMYFALLON Here’s one: Why is it the vehement approach to being against Obama’s plan is to abandon health care reform altogether? #
  • “You lie” RT @factcheckdotorg http://bit.ly/fnYRP – Immigrants and Insurance: How HR 3200 affects Illegal Immigrants #
  • “If the great American people will only keep their temper, on both sides of the line, the trouble will come to an end” -Abraham Lincoln 1861 #
  • “It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds.” -Samuel Adams #
  • [The Civil War] “It was not the salvation of the Union; it was the rebirth of the Union.” – Woodrow Wilson, 1915 : Is it coming again? #
  • OMG You’re a sparkly vampire — it’s my birthday — kiss me ! LOL http://bit.ly/Zv7k4 #
  • Why is it people can’t accept that two people who love their country equally can disagree? Why must they hate each other … E Pluribus Unum #
  • Thank you #excedrin for salvaging the last few hours of a head throbbing day :\ #
  • RT @GStephanopoulos Pawlenty Backs Off Nullification http://bit.ly/3yoKN6 <– Just demonstrating that you can disagree without attacking. #
  • The fall of the US won’t be the fault of social reforms or unnecessary wars. It will come from the intolerance and ignorance of its people. #

Powered by Twitter Tools

A la recherche d’une bouquet de gens …

For anyone who might not get the title, it translates to “In search of a bouquet of people,” and it arose from a simple observation I made this morning.

(No, I’m not referring to the lingering sensual remnants we experience after a sip of wine …  :-D )

First, I want to lead into the subject by saying how a bouquet of flowers is often viewed as much more beautiful than the flower itself.  Obviously, if the single flower were completely lacking in beauty, the resulting bouquet would need to seek alternate avenues of beauty to achieve it.

Secondly, I’m specifically referring to bouquets of the same flower.  Examples: a dozen roses, 6 carnations of the same color, etc.

So how does this relate to people?  I noticed two people at the gas station this morning, a woman and a man, each wearing tan slacks and a light blue button down shirt.  Given that I am really not one to notice attire (at all), this alone was a good example of contextual violence, since it grabbed my attention.  In fact, I thought the two people were correlated in some way, even though they were driving completely different cars– make, model, color, size–and they were on opposite sides of the pumps.

Anyway, it dawned on me that we often feel somewhat cheated when we see two (or more) people wearing identical outfits for no apparent reason.  It’s like we expect some grand story to be the cause, yet a dozen roses is simply amplified beauty.

No, all the bouquets of people that we find appealing are in things like church choirs, or sports teams, company employees, etc. where the underlying story is rather predictable.  Six carnations would seem pretty unexpected, even at a funeral or wedding where massive amounts of bouquets are hardly even stand out contextually.

I’m not really trying to prove a deep philosophical point, but I’m pondering where the apparent lack of uniqueness in people caused by random (or at least unrelated) circumstances, linking people in no way but the visual, can bring us the deep sense joy of that bouquet of roses.

It’s a fair argument to say that any group of people is quite a lovely bouquet, as the diversity and contributions they put forth can be astounding, but I suppose that’s not what I’m looking for.

A la recherche d’une bouquet de gens …

My new campaign: US Congresspeople, the President, and the Supreme Court Justices should forfeit their salary

You know, it’s a funny thought, but representing the people of the United States is more a civic duty and a means to an end than a career.  Check the writings of the founders of this nation — you represent this country because it’s the right thing to do, not because you can make a lifetime out of it.  (Sorry, no references here, but it’s true — anyway it’s my opinion regardless of who else shares it).

So here’s the thing:  All US Congresspeople should waive their rights to compensation via the US Treasury completely.

Yes, there is a recession right now, and it would be a genuine, stewartly statement.  But there have been recessions before, and that shouldn’t be the reason.

Senators and Representatives (and even the President and Supreme Court Justices) work very hard, and they deserve to make top dollar.  That being said, they should be performing their duties out of service to their country, not to get paid.

So, here is my proposal:  there will be a salary for all Congresspeople (Representatives and Senators), the President, and the Supreme Court Justices.

However, if their adjusted gross income on their tax returns exceeds said salary, they must pay the balance back to the IRS.

So, the freshman Congressman from state X only makes $30k a year as a teacher? Fine, pay him the $144k balance up to his $174k salary (2009 — US Congress Salaries and Benefits).  Congresspeople deserve $174k a year, but not when they’re already raking it in as a lawyer, writer — whatever.

I am titling this the “US Government Salary Forfeiture Movement.”  If you agree, spread the word.  I want this to become the law.  I wish these guys were already doing it, as it seems like the right thing to volunteer for.

Anyway, tag your blogs with “US Forfeiture” — get the word out, get people talking.  No high level government official has the right to complain about any fiscal issue while he or she is taking unnecessary funds from the US Treasury for performing a basic, humble, civic duty.

At the very minimum, this makes your representatives in government boldly claim that they are doing their job as a service to their country, not as a means to wealth.

An overabundance of souls …

I do not believe in God or any other mystical entity, creature, power source, etc., and I’ll make no effort to mask it, hide it, distort it, or spin it. I mention this, since it is mostly irrelevant to the general theme of this post, to make sure it is clear. Given that, what I am about to write has nothing to do with proving or disproving anything, it is simply a question.

So one has to ask, if human beings are occupied by souls (and I won’t consider the possibility of any other animals fitting the same category), why is it the number of humans are increasing? What causes a soul to decide “I want to leave whatever state I am in,” and why, as time passes, do more decide to take the leap?

Will the overcrowding from Earth be a problem in Heaven too? And why are these souls exiting from Heaven to spend a relatively short lifetime proving their worth to enter back there? Presumably, the souls aren’t coming from hell.

However, there is always the possibility that new souls are being created, but does that not beg the question “Why?”

Just more notes, thoughts from my unrequited curiosity.

More on the concept of free will

I want to first mention the fact that I have written a lot — I mean a LOT — over the years about many philosophical themes.  Common among them are existentialism and purpose, as well as a host of others that just don’t seem to deliver themselves to my fingers at the moment, but undoubtedly, the most common theme is free will.  It’s a concept that really is paradoxically, if nothing else, contradictory.

Regardless of my prolific writing in the past, lately, philosophy is something that comes only in a moment where immediate reason and clarification are required.  Evidence:  I haven’t written a song in over 3 years.  More evidence:  I have no philosophical writings to speak of in about the same time period.  Keep in mind, as well, that the majority of my philosophical writings are scribble on class notes in college or random thoughts in a text-file “note-journal” in which I used to regularly write.

Ideally, I would get back to the stage where those thoughts and theoretical elucidations would flow from my mind as easily as anything else I say in a day.  (I do have misgivings on how “easy” that really is, but since it is a common occurrence, it has to be comparatively mundane.)  Then again, I go back over a lot of my writings, and I realize I’ve said pretty much all I can imagine saying.

The trouble is, I’m not 100% sure what I’ve said has affected anyone, so I develop pangs of purpose.  Anyway, since that is a completely different topic, I will stray from my tangent.  Albeit likely narcissisticly, I read over even my songs that I’ve written and am almost amazed by the points I’ve brought out.  I’ve somehow documented myself abstractly but definitively through rather convoluted metaphor.  This pleases me, yet the lack of such documentation has always been the drive to produce more songs, more writings, more philosophy.  Have I succeeded or failed?

Please don’t interpret this as a cry for assurance.  The ultimate problem that exists here is not whether I have affected anyone, but whether doing so really meant anything to begin with.

I am relatively contented in what I have produced.  I can objectively quantify the discoveries of my life, yet even with the lull — the hiatus — currently present, I still feel the need to boil down all philosophical doctrines to a simple truth — hopefully one that delivers purpose.

There is much more to say here, and it’s somewhat regrettable that I’m insisting on leaving it out of this particular article, but I will get back to it some day.  The great thing is, the more I write, the more I realize I’d like to say again.

Since this blog is effectively a new forum, I do not have as much concern with rehashing old, delivered truths, because they’re relevant to new potential postulations.  I will, therefore, simply state that at one point in my life, I did all I could to abandon all values, morals, doctrines, that were, well, indoctrinated into me, in order to take a more pragmatic, premise-conclusion based set of ideals.

That being said, there is one ultimate rule that I have concluded, one assumption from which all explanations are nascent.

“Everything is a system.”

Simple, right?  Obvious, right?  But it’s the truth.  The fact is, nothing can be without something already having been before it, excluding, of course, the obvious “thing” that started it all.

Continuing, I want to rehash something I had previously written.  I am not going to take the time to support or argue its validity, because I’m pretty convinced on its truth.  I always welcome debate, and I will respond, but, nonetheless, the proposed “Law” is pretty self-explanatory.

Anyway:

LAW:  One cannot have something to say without having heard something said.
Corollary:  One quotation deserves another thirty.
Related:  Mulder, Small Potatoes “… ultimately maybe it’s other people’s
reactions to us that make us who we are”

[I tend to quote TV shows and the like.  This is, of course, an X-Files reference]

:: A reaction to a statement is just that; this reaction depends on the
statement in accordance with the reactors contextual assocations and
previous experience.  It has nothing to do with his or her intelligence
or will.
:: Our actions are but re
actions to other actions; the resulting reactions
define how we will react in the future.  It is somewhat broader than
implied by “Mulder” in that our personality in words is defined through
others personalities in words, but our interpretations belong to the
realm of all observation, linguistic, and ultimately, sensual.

The obvious conclusion is, free will is almost impossible, because everything happens as a result of something else.  Think about it, and get back to me.

There is a host of additional derivations that can result, but I will leave it as pure statement.  I can already feel the philosophy brewing again, and I can see more elaborations to come.  :-D

Rush “Freewill

“You can choose a ready guide in some celestial voice //
If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice //
You can choose from phantom fears and kindness that can kill //
I will choose a path as clear. I will choose free will”

This chorus really bothers me. The concept of making a choice has an implied adjunct of options. That is, there are limited things to choose from. Free will implies that each individual can make up their mind, and yes, I would agree with that for the most part, but the choices are limited and unaffected by the chooser.

The idea of choosing free will is simply preposterous, because the choice is being made in order to express the chooser’s freedom, yet in choosing it, the chooser is accepting that it isn’t something innate to him. Does this not seem a bizarre contradiction to everyone else? On a side note the music to this song, as with the majority of Rush songs, is unbelievable. Anyway I am not certain that Neil Peart didn’t have some sort of ironic reason for saying this the way he did, but it really bugs me at face value.

(This was written a while ago, but I thought I would port it to this blog)

A fascinating irony of homosexuality …

First of all, let me note that I am not homophobic or against homosexuality in any way.  I support gay marriage, because, let’s face it, who the hell really cares?

Anyway, something that has always fascinated me about gay people is that they quite often, stereotypically, go out of their way to behave like their stereotypical counterparts of the opposite sex.

Simply put, why are many lesbians “butch” and many gay men flamboyantly effeminate?

You have to ask yourself, why would a lesbian woman be interested in other women who act like men, and why would a gay man be interested in other men who act like women?  It seems the contradiction …

Now, I realize that oftentimes these personality types are kind of genetic, hormonal, and I realize that even though they are stereotypes, they’re probably not typical in the actual statistics, but the irony is still there, and it befuddles me.  That’s all  ;)